Crisis Communication Failure: Lessons from a Texas Chemical Incident. In a recent and troubling event, a chemical company in southeast Texas experienced a substantial gas release. The leak was so severe that it could be seen from nearby highways and traffic cameras. As wind carried the gas into residential neighborhoods and nearby towns, schools-initiated lockdown procedures and local governments issued shelter-in-place warnings.
And yet—from the company responsible—there was silence.
Despite the panic and immediate concern from the public, only two posts were made on a community emergency response Facebook page. The local school district and government officials were informed. But not the broader public. No press release. No executive statement. Not even a formal apology after the “all clear” was declared.
This wasn’t just a misstep in public relations. It was a complete failure in social responsibility—and it sent a damaging message that won’t soon be forgotten. Here is TV coverage of the event from the CBS Affiliate KHOU-TV in Houston, TX. Here is another link to the coverage from the NBC-TV affiliate KPRC-TV in Houston, TX.
Why Corporate Silence Is a Communication Strategy—A Bad One
In moments of crisis, not saying anything is saying everything.
Silence can imply a host of negative assumptions:
- Legal fear: “Our lawyers told us to stay quiet.”
- Avoidance: “We hope this will blow over.”
- Self-preservation: “My reputation matters more than public safety.”
The problem? Communities interpret these as indifference, incompetence, or even guilt. In a digital age, where transparency and speed are essential, any delay in communication gets filled with fear, rumor, and speculation.
The Role of Public Trust in Emergency Situations
Trust isn’t given—it’s earned.
And in times of crisis, the stakes are even higher. When a company remains silent, it damages the emotional contract with the people it serves. Communication during emergencies is not optional. It’s part of being a good corporate citizen.
Public trust, once lost, is incredibly hard to regain. In this incident, the vacuum of communication created suspicion, fear, and frustration—all of which could’ve been mitigated by a timely, honest response.
Public Relations vs. Social Responsibility
Many companies still treat PR as a defensive measure—something to “spin” bad news rather than acknowledge and address it.
But crisis communication isn’t about optics. It’s about empathy, responsibility, and truth.
Hiding behind legalese or vague statements erodes credibility. The true purpose of public relations should be to serve as a bridge between a company and its stakeholders—especially in times of danger.
Anatomy of a Crisis Communication Failure
Here’s what went wrong in this case:
- No immediate acknowledgement of the event,
- No executive leadership presence,
- Lack of empathy toward affected communities,
- Inadequate use of communication channels,
- No visible corrective actions shared afterward,
This is not just poor planning—it’s negligence in the court of public opinion.
Understanding CAER – And Its Limitations
A Community Awareness Emergency Response (CAER) network is a helpful tool, but it is not a substitute for real-time, direct communication from the company itself.
Too many corporations use CAERs as shields instead of amplifiers. If you rely on CAER, give them accurate and timely information. But also ensure that your brand speaks for itself. Leadership must show up, communicate clearly, and be accountable.
The Impact of Speculation and Social Media Misinformation
When official voices remain silent, unofficial ones get louder.
Social media platforms become breeding grounds for:
- – Panic
- – Misinformation
- – Conspiracy theories
- – Accusations
This chemical event saw dozens of viral posts before any real communication emerged. By then, fear had spread faster than facts. This is why speed and presence matter so much in crisis management.
What Effective Crisis Communication Looks Like
A strong communication strategy during a crisis follows these five golden principles:
- Speed – Acknowledge the incident ASAP.
- Visibility – Show the public you care through leadership presence.
- Multichannel – Be present on social media, websites, radio, and local news.
- Coordination – Align with emergency services and government officials.
- Follow-through – Don’t stop after the incident. Keep people informed on what’s being done to prevent a repeat.
Speed: The First Move That Builds Confidence
In crisis situations, time is a luxury no one has. The first response within the first hour can set the tone for everything that follows. A quick acknowledgment of the issue doesn’t require having all the answers—it requires showing awareness and concern.
Here’s what a rapid initial response might include:
- Acknowledge the incident occurred.
- Affirm that safety protocols are being followed.
- Assure the public that updates will be frequent and transparent.
This shows that the company is awake, alert, and accountable.
Visibility: Putting a Face on the Response
The public needs more than logos and written statements—they need people.
Assigning a trained spokesperson or having the company’s leadership appear publicly adds a human element to the crisis. It’s a clear signal that the company isn’t hiding. Being present—on camera, in town halls, or during press briefings—gives the affected community someone to connect with and listen to.
💡 Best Practice: Have a crisis response team that includes trained speakers who understand both technical details and emotional intelligence.
Multichannel Engagement: Meeting the Public Where They Are
Relying solely on a single communication platform (e.g., Facebook or CAER) is outdated and risky.
A multichannel strategy ensures broader reach:
- Social media updates (Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram),
- Local TV and radio alerts,
- Website banners or landing pages,
- Press releases to news agencies,
- SMS/email alerts for subscribed residents,
The key is consistency across all platforms and timeliness of updates.
Coordination: Working With Local Authorities
Crisis communication isn’t a solo act.
During emergencies, public trust depends on a unified front from:
- City governments,
- School districts,
- Emergency services,
- Health departments,
Coordinated communication helps avoid conflicting messages and builds confidence that all key stakeholders are working together.
💬 Tip: Schedule joint briefings or use shared platforms for synchronized announcements.
Follow-Through: The Forgotten Element of PR
Too often, companies breathe a sigh of relief once the initial danger is over. But post-crisis communication is where trust is either rebuilt—or permanently lost.
Here’s how to follow through:
- Provide updates on investigations or root-cause analyses.
- Share steps taken to prevent recurrence.
- Invite community questions via forums or Q&A sessions.
- Publicly apologize, if warranted.
Without this step, all prior communication loses its weight. People remember actions more than words.
Legal vs. Ethical Advice in Crisis Communication
Legal teams often advise silence to avoid liability. But what protects you in court might harm you in the court of public opinion.
There’s a delicate but essential balance between:
- Protecting the company legally,
- Maintaining public trust,
Legal language is often cold, vague, and unfeeling. During a crisis, ethical responsibility and empathy must guide the tone and content of communication—even when lawyers are involved.
Corporate Culture and Its Role in Crisis Response
A company’s reaction to crisis often reflects its internal culture.
Does your leadership:
- Encourage transparency or secrecy?
- Prioritize community well-being or PR optics?
- Empower employees to respond or keep quiet?
If fear of backlash overrides values like honesty and integrity, silence becomes the default. But in healthy cultures, open communication is trained, planned, and reinforced long before the crisis hits
Building a Proactive Crisis Communication Plan
Being prepared is the best defense. Every organization should have a Crisis Communication Plan (CCP) that includes:
| Element | Description |
| Spokesperson Roster | Pre-designated, trained communicators |
| Message Templates | Pre-written for common scenarios |
| Approval Workflow | Defined process for legal/comms sign-off |
| Communication Channels | Social media, email, press, SMS, town halls |
| Simulation Drills | Annual or biannual mock drills for practice |
| Feedback Loops | Mechanisms for the public to share concerns and questions |
Investing in this preparation minimizes delays and boosts credibility when it matters most.
Final Lessons: Silence Is Not an Option
The chemical release in southeast Texas offers a chilling case study on what not to do.
Silence is not neutral. It speaks volumes—and none of it is good.
Corporate responsibility means being:
- Present when the public needs answers.
- Transparent even when the truth is uncomfortable.
- Trustworthy in both words and actions.
Public relations is not about hiding mistakes—it’s about owning them and doing better.
FAQs on Crisis Communication in the Corporate World
- What is the first step in handling a corporate crisis?
Answer: The first step is to acknowledge the situation publicly and communicate that the company is actively addressing it. Early acknowledgment builds credibility and reduces speculation. - How fast should companies respond to an incident?
Answer: Ideally, within the first hour. Rapid response shows awareness, control, and empathy. - Can legal advice prevent companies from speaking publicly?
Answer: Yes, but a balance must be struck. It’s possible to communicate responsibly without compromising legal standing. - What happens if a company stays silent during a crisis?
Answer: Silence leads to speculation, misinformation, and loss of public trust. It’s often seen as guilt or negligence. - Is social media enough for crisis communication?
Answer: No. Social media is only one piece. Companies must use multichannel strategies including press, email, and live updates. - What should a good Crisis Communication Plan include?
Answer: It should have trained spokespersons, clear messaging templates, a fast approval workflow, and simulations to test readiness.
🔚 Conclusion
The lesson is clear: silence is not a crisis strategy.
Companies that choose to communicate with transparency, empathy, and urgency not only protect their reputation—they earn long-term trust and respect. Let this real-world incident serve as a wake-up call to organizations everywhere: speak early, speak clearly, and speak often.
If you want to contact us and discuss a crisis communications plan for your business, please complete the form below. All your information is confidential and not shared with anyone.